Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
2.2022年了，看到傲慢的英国人说着强盛的大英帝国，咋那么想笑呢，啊哈哈哈哈哈！
英德的太好嗑了
印度双娇抗英神剧，看久了美国的超英片，再看看印度的超英片也算是一种视觉奇观，这根本已经不算事普通人了，看久了还是挺有魔性的。
安宁的时代是一种奢求，混沌才是永恒的状态。只不过对于在短暂的窗口期长大的人而言，时代的迅速扭转是需要时间去接受的。
讲历史的片子屁股坐歪了，捏造事实洗地误导观众，两星不能再多
死到临头，还在追寻不切实际的梦想？
1930，夏天，牛津，同窗，分道扬镳，重逢，分享一根烟。就这你问我有没有看出queer subtext？嗯？22年2月底，历史照进现实了。
还行吧，没事可以看看，真实政治背景下编造的人物故事
最后这算是洗白张伯伦？以牺牲个人的私德揭露希特勒假面具？
燃爆了好吧！什么叫文化自信！！！什么他妈的叫文化自信！！！
头可断，血可流，发型不能乱。本片三大特点：耍帅、耍帅、还是耍帅。逻辑性？不存在的。合理性？不需要的。
架白马车，穿越火海，给你戴手铐；
英式的克制平淡，“闷片”不闷。三个人躺倒在草坪看烟火的夏天真好。小外交官和小翻译是什么顶配职业人设，92组演技真心不错，浅嗑一口。（荞麦的脆弱感引起了我的兴趣
硬核开挂 商业娱乐套路 合家欢 爽片 抗英神剧 /（全球电影商业化成功？现在的电影观感技术都上来了 剪辑特效灯光调色都很好 故事感觉都大同小异（都以前的…/ 印度人很好玩 乐观自信 浮夸 能歌善舞（尬舞笑死（最近笑点奇低 /双男主大概有印度那边神的隐喻 无论是手的相扣 水与火 还有大战一的野兽火轮战车登场等一些人物构图场景/奇特的想象力 神化强化主角 歌舞 浮夸反应情节 以及慢慢慢慢慢动作（reaction、动作、煽情都会有= = plus大大大场面（爆破、火 形成一种宇宙宝莱坞特色印度咖喱风味～（很喜欢他们的自信乐观可能是他们的文化教育宗教歌舞影响？不了解/
洗白张伯伦，也是够了。绥靖政策主导者正是张伯伦，也就是绥靖政策进一步撩拨了纳粹的野心，并没有像电影中所说的延缓战争，反而是加速了战争的到来。
Emmmm看得不是很认真，节奏舒缓适合静下心来看
我去过新疆，在乌鲁木齐的大巴扎，感觉那边每个人从出生就会跳舞，那种歌舞真的是太有魔力了。我真为自己一点不会跳舞感到惭愧。就像印度电影的歌舞，它从来就是加分项，它征服了全世界，可就是有些国人高高在上的说人家尬舞。
节奏很好， 导演很逊，歌曲好听。电影主旨是为张伯伦洗白？当年丘吉尔怎样在Hause里苦口婆心地希望大家看到希特勒狼子野心的？可是都被一张薄薄的慕尼黑条约蒙了眼睛！
3.5分，無太多高潮，歷史回顧順便洗白英國PM, 無功勞有苦勞
剧情非常契合今天的夜宵烧烤暴力事件，结局是男女老幼所有人都获得了枪，每个人都该有把枪。不常见的南印度泰卢固语，抛开开挂问题，动作设计特别有意思而且很燃。每次起跑出拳都要匀速慢镜头特写让人以为动作指导是扎克施耐德。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
