Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
香艳的画面很多，让人时不时会有一种欲望。故事让我会想起“爱的发声练习”，虽然也是部口碑不佳的电影。温贞菱的演出堪称大胆。但故事主题实在有够灰色。男女主苟且在一起，只不过是寻求一个心理上的避风港，一个孤独时可以宣泄的对象。
剧情乱七八糟。
见过狗血的，没见过这么狗血的[笑cry]。几乎每个人都来了个反转：的士司机涉黑、警察是dirty police，闺蜜和老公偷情，男妓是小偷，房东用隐蔽摄像头偷窥房客做爱....不过却意外地好看。
Blair放弃形象的演出还不错，剧情也算紧凑。
还好结局是好的，不然真的要被女主“善良”哭了，不过现实生活中又谁是会带着上帝视角的呢
完全能夠理解「不想一個人」的寓意，但故事線索和鏡頭剪輯真像是災難般存在，太過於依賴形而下的肉身陪伴，每個人都戾氣十足。不喜這樣的風格。臺北電影獎最佳攝影獎提名，serious？
现实中两个审美品味不在一个层次的，应该很难遇到；
好多年没看见莉顿了 好吧 每个事业低谷的女星都会经历的网飞大数据电影
好多破绽。一个玩具怎么拖一具尸体？两具尸体的重量，搬运的人不觉得有问题？司机听到棺材传来电话铃声，无动于衷。警方搜索到电话的位置，却无法确定具体位置。坏人让男主用了那么长的时间来交出尸体，长到他有足够的时间挖坟，搜查屋子，审问一个什么都知道的黑客，准备武器等等。最后坏人变成了机械人。这爆炸力度，这撞击力，这烧伤程度，还能反抗，太匪夷所思了。
反转，反转，再反转，不管合不合理，就是翻来覆去得转
我们Queen B真的是倒了血霉啊 老公 闺蜜都对她不忠💔
出轨的男人不如朋友和路人系列。 ps.相信自己的内心，疑心生暗鬼
对其他人物刻画过猛导致第二十分钟就猜出谁是真凶。
女主演技尴尬哭了……每次发现啥马上叭叭叭当面对峙😅剧本也好无语，前几天看了深水，同五分多深水可看性好多了（虽然那个也烂，但这个也就3.5不能更多了
反正就看着挺脑残的，女主也牺牲挺大，基本全素颜出镜，够勇敢
皮条客与小姐以及富豪小三的故事。
没看过走到尽头和破局，但是光看这部还是蛮好看的，毕竟剧本扎实
想拍成艺术片的三级片。一条龙虎豹是个什么公司？可以关注下
Restless.2022.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DUAL.DDP5.1.x264-TEPES 怎么老是翻拍这部？
与其说讲的是爱情，不如说是讲性，讲欲望与孤独。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
