剧情介绍

  这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
  An absurdist classic
  This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.

评论:

  • 贡思恩 1小时前 :

    感觉像是看了一部两个小时的电视剧,对没看过原剧的观众不太友好。

  • 萧博涛 6小时前 :

    就让导演带着走吧

  • 芝妍 9小时前 :

    这电影名字起的太科幻了吧,应该就叫《约翰奇遇记》。

  • 良卓 4小时前 :

    三星半,不像前傳的「前傳」。視覺是懷舊的,語境是現代的,但時代元素、借古鑑今的連結度實在弱。關於Tony是怎樣煉成的,亦只是蜻蜓點水。本片最大的作用,可能就是叫觀眾再看一次昔日神劇。

  • 虞淑华 9小时前 :

    阴差阳错的巧合,藤原龙也也太像那个谁了把~!

  • 香楠 7小时前 :

    两星给娜酱的,这剧情我看得云里雾里,始终搞不明白想表达什么。

  • 祁锦昌 4小时前 :

    其实就是那么点相当凑巧的事儿,学学毛利小五郎难得糊涂一回不好吗…

  • 汝长逸 0小时前 :

    来源于生活,拍得挺好,而且拍摄手法很不错,穿插回放,真实改编,所以感觉这才是事件的巧妙

  • 欧和悌 6小时前 :

    真是又水又敷衍的黑帮片……但突然想看教父系列和美国往事了。

  • 芃俊 0小时前 :

    真的很好看,神作,全程无尿点,要留意每一个细节,很棒,牛

  • 浦迎南 1小时前 :

    真是又水又敷衍的黑帮片……但突然想看教父系列和美国往事了。

  • 苦绮烟 1小时前 :

    你的地盘里有不服管教的小混混,你不感到可耻吗?

  • 鸿允 7小时前 :

    電影前半段是救人,後半段是渡己。

  • 骞然 2小时前 :

    我觉得没那么差,虽然看了电视剧,但是编剧好像在考观众对原电机剧熟悉程度,本身电视剧很多就不甚明了,电影变成了考试,观众自然不高兴。

  • 运震 3小时前 :

    帮助回想起了一些电视剧的情节,作为独立的黑帮电影那种不知道谁会随时挂掉的氛围算是给足了。

  • 颛孙风华 7小时前 :

    浪费时间的片子。用碎片化的结构来故弄玄虚,但是因为真相过于无聊,最后将所有片段串起来的时候毫无酣畅淋漓恍然大悟的感觉,只会觉得“哦,这样啊,爱咋咋地吧”。剧情简介也很故弄玄虚,果然是跟影片中的小说家一样会遣词造句,其实就是编辑发现小说家的小说可能不是虚构的,是真人真事,怕惹上名誉权官司去查,结果发现确实是真事,哪里有惊愕?另外还见过一个版本的剧情简介写的像是现实事件随着小说情节的发展而发展,颇为奇幻,妥妥的简介欺诈。

  • 衡叶彤 7小时前 :

    沃茨是制片人之一。小成本。暴雪景色很美。剧本要是好好打磨,会很不错。剪辑不太好。片子里那个男的有病。

  • 星铭 6小时前 :

    三万円的兜兜转转/在束手无策的时候、但还是希望会有奇迹发生的时候,就鼓掌吧/藤原龙也让人上瘾

  • 珊洲 3小时前 :

    三星半,不像前傳的「前傳」。視覺是懷舊的,語境是現代的,但時代元素、借古鑑今的連結度實在弱。關於Tony是怎樣煉成的,亦只是蜻蜓點水。本片最大的作用,可能就是叫觀眾再看一次昔日神劇。

  • 赛博敏 7小时前 :

    从饼近几年戏路来看笑死,不需要爱的夏天→变色龙→死笔(恶役)开司→鸠(被恶役欺负),像是年轻时作恶太多,得到报应了哈哈哈

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved