Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
看到神就是奇迹，看到鬼魂就是神经病。就是想让我们闭嘴！
家族里的每个人都拥有魔法，没有魔法的我就成了异类。当魔法逐渐消退，拥有魔法的人终于开始恐慌。虽然我不能搬运石桥和驴子，无法让丛林花草焕发生机，不会和动物对话，无法让天气变晴。但我可以预知大厦将倾，魔法失效，我愿意为了拯救家族去勇敢冒险，最大的魔法是面对未知世界的勇气和对家人的爱。
见鬼照第六感差，同情病人的医生被疯，比第六病室差，被疯女性的苦难，比红颜劫差。。。看着有点BORING，搞得像命题作文、诉苦大会。。。能不能像白毛女一样编个好故事？
老哥迷信鬼屋企业家族，有点好看有点好笑，老鼠黍和花Elsa，不过本来无限潜力的超能没多有趣，倒是用Spengnish强力confuse其他multilinguals。林曼米生拼硬造的歌一贯难堪，唯一好听的《两只蝴蝶虫》还抄了Lily Allen半首
可以对比《飞越疯人院》看，看看主角的表现的差异，看看评论的差异。
“今晚不知道谁才是真正的疯子”压抑着看完，还好女主逃脱了，虚伪的医生，无知的跟随者，人面兽心，把女性当什么？现在女性的自由是多么不易啊！
当银幕前的女性破除万难勇敢奋力地走向幕后，这样的故事一定比她单纯当演员那些更值得被讲述、被看见！
3.5分，沒想到是第二女主當導演，恍惚是真人真事改編，19世紀末法國女人還無緣無故（或者說非我族類之“標準”），送入不人道的精神病院, 女人無法掌握他們的命運，是父親，是醫生，懲罰她們的是體制，是所謂的假科學，簡直是等同中世紀把無辜女性女巫化
历史上女人倒霉的黑时代不少，疯人院算是比较仁慈的一个了，毕竟当时背景都快20世纪了，故事性价值比较低，再加之半记传半纪录的演绎方式，不好看
结尾太老套，整体基调还不错。《圣母》更胜一筹
故事讲得感觉有点虎头蛇尾，但并不影响后面在医院里的剧情。
无法言喻，两位女主角演的特别好。虽然没有什么恐怖的画面，但是真的极其恐怖(๑ó﹏ò๑
一群自以为是的男医生随意地用所谓的女疯子做着各种实验，显示自己的学识和能力。女护士们是坚定的执行者，甚至有人借机以折磨病人为乐。被关起来的疯子却治愈着身边的茫然活着的正常人，让她内心得到自由，疯子身体得到自由，一起强大。根据记载那个时代欧洲疯人院多到惊人，满足了很多人的“需要”。
“现实中的人怎么可能看待灵魂呢？”
揭开疯女人的黑色面纱，现出男权对女性的碾压
家族里的每个人都拥有魔法，没有魔法的我就成了异类。当魔法逐渐消退，拥有魔法的人终于开始恐慌。虽然我不能搬运石桥和驴子，无法让丛林花草焕发生机，不会和动物对话，无法让天气变晴。但我可以预知大厦将倾，魔法失效，我愿意为了拯救家族去勇敢冒险，最大的魔法是面对未知世界的勇气和对家人的爱。
“今晚不知道谁才是真正的疯子”压抑着看完，还好女主逃脱了，虚伪的医生，无知的跟随者，人面兽心，把女性当什么？现在女性的自由是多么不易啊！
两位美女美出天际，故事中规中矩不算挖得太深太狠。7分合适
一堆丧心病狂的医疗💢一群自以为是的医生👎是救人还是害人心中有数吧..只要人做不到和看不到的都认为你疯了就关进去这鬼地方 是天赋和天才就是疯了吗?我看正常人也不过如此😕女主说的没错!逼疯咱就是你们这些伪科医的人还科学呢搞笑🙃信God不信Ghost..看到真的非要说是假的..好虚伪啊 到底谁才是疯子??这不已经很明显么 送进去不是帮助是虐待，那弟弟也真是下头，真不知道里面是什么情况吗?有你这种弟弟倒了八辈子霉😷还有那群人渣的下半身是装了马达吗?你们这群男人都没问题?我不信😒怎么就不抓进去呢不也是很疯狂的行为么..所以这名字不应该叫疯女人舞会叫疯男人都是渣好了 男人看女人就是当母猪母牛的..所以男人是什么东西?dog吗🤔
虽然妳没有门，但妳是打开魔法之门的把手啊！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
