Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
爸爸和妈妈两位再续二十年前13 Going on 30的前缘。不错👍
Ryan Reynolds简直是第二个德普，演完死侍后无论出演什么角色都是嘴炮+贱萌的复制黏贴。以前是中土世界成就漫威下岗再就业，现在轮到网飞了。小朋友蛮可爱。以及，谁不想要一把光剑啊！
唯一漏洞：高速飞行的子弹都能吸走，装着同样子弹的枪吸不走？
有点儿戏的感觉，时空穿越不应该刻画的很严肃？
网飞，吃饭和工作无聊时看，有的电影确实只适合线上点播，尽管伪装成了别的样子。和强森一样，雷诺兹演的电影都是同一个角色，做演员做成这样也真的是令人羡慕的成功。关于时间这块，设定也太convenient了
看这种旧瓶装旧酒的片子跟去楼下排队100分钟做核酸差不多。
Ryan Reynolds也就这样了，流水线量产的电影可不值得我认真观看。
影片整体就如一篇合格的八股文，工整而老套，无趣也无新意……甚至有些部分非常拖沓……
“如果我遵循我内心的想法，你的脸早就被我打烂了。”
3、这一家子姓Reed，死侍他爸爸是浩克、妈妈是艾丽卡、对象是卡魔拉，连结尾放球的储物箱的盖子都是贴着漫威角色的贴纸，假如女反派给演阿加莎的那位来演，岂不更漫威式正确？
标准爆米花，看着挺开心的
适合低龄小朋友观看，保护森林爱护动物的良好宣传片，小孩子看得开心就好！
7.5
同一导演，主演也都是瑞安，但是两部片的差距还是蛮大的，剧情槽点真的很多，整的跟过家家似的，特别是最后女反派挂的也太让人感到诧异了，总体感觉智商受到了侮辱，动作戏也是比较敷衍，不过亲情这条线还是可以的，特别是结尾那一块稍许有点感动。特效也还算凑合。整体来说，网飞的正常水平吧。
小贱贱（绿灯侠）+绿巨人+卡魔拉的漫威三绿人组合的爆米花片，但感觉好像三位大巨星输给了一个小孩子，甚至感觉都输给了那只可爱的小狗狗。时间旅游其实本身就是悖论，除非开平行空间。但如果是开平行空间的话，人是改变不了自己的现实的，无论你指导平行空间的另一个自己怎么改变，改变的也只是另一个自己的人生走向。导演或编剧思维还是比较混乱的，但感觉做为爆米花片，还是值得一观的。
硬是要在几个人的小打小闹背后套上一个宏大的背景。资金都用去请明星了吧，全程靠嘴炮划水，场景都没换几个。女反派2018年那的换头技术太糙了！
little Adam: you hate him because he died.you made yourself hating him coz it's easier than missing him。这种跟自己以及亲人和解的情感内核，总是让我破防啊！ (Mike)
我从不懂科学，也从不理解它，超越了生死的不幸和黑洞，穿越的无奈与甜蜜，名为亚当，无法创世。
告诉孩子：如果走丢了，在原地等，不要自作主张去找妈妈。妈妈孩子找来找去找了一个半小时。。。
6.2/10，流水线式大电影，Netflix总是这样一如既往的稳定。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
