Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
之前很多关于月球的假说理论都在本片实现了，比如月球空心理论，月球是外星文明的飞船理论。还有其他诸如人类是高的文明在地球培育的产物理论。简直来了一锅大杂烩。于文文的角色就跟范冰冰在钢铁侠三中的角色，韩庚在变形金刚里的角色一样鸡肋。表面看上去能自圆其说，但是漏洞还不少，最后那个胖子在核弹炸死的一瞬间，居然能够被计算机扫描，就有点扯吧。而且把外星人都灭了的悲哀怎么能够被人类这么轻易消灭呢？主角光环太强大了吧。但是仅仅从观影感受来说上面月球飞滚下面人类狂跑，看着还是挺爽的
这种烂片有存在的意义吗 我真的是 想把世界观立的大大的 但是真的很降智 过了一个礼拜我都记不得剧情了 还阴谋论 有本事像环太平洋那样 搞几个先祖出来露露脸吧 无病呻吟 在这里听你纯推理 反正人类就是最厉害行吧 去看看人家不要抬头 朴实无华 再看看你怎么编的吧 反正我是不爱看
JJ真的长得太英俊秀气了，就算扮演一个坏蛋还是让我有一种警方卧底的错觉。
场面很大，视效还行，逻辑好像欠奉。另外作为科幻片几处关键情节不合情理也让人不能忍，博物馆里拉个几十年前的飞船就能上天，就算你电子设备无恙油箱可以加注，你怎么短短时间把飞船从博物馆穿过城市废墟拉到发射场竖起来，这硬核物理挪移你总不能玩崂山道士吧，那你还不如折个纸飞机掷上去呢。至于软件上，美式英雄主义和陈腔滥调的逆子和解亲情爱情等美式高大上，味儿是有点熏人，但捏着鼻子也不是不能看下去。全家在上下九平安大戏院看。
月亮果然还是家园，不过这下是真的变成人类共识了。所有的惊奇点、感动点和转折点都在可预计范围内，包括在华谊兄弟投资下电影加入的一些中国元素和塞进的中国演员。看完就是比较平静与疲惫，符合罗兰巴特所说：“他喜欢这种从电影院里走出来的感觉，重新来到明亮而宽敞的马路上(通常是某个工作日晚上)，不确定地朝着某家咖啡馆或是什么地方走去。他默默地走着(他不喜欢谈论刚刚看过的电影)，有点困倦迟钝，裹紧衣服，仍感到阵阵寒意。”
看不下去了，剧情太烂，夜晚的几场戏特效也假，抠图痕迹明显。
都是2012和后天的cliché，关于我们起源与一切的真相何时才能揭露？？
跳过了前半部分很多文戏以及后半部分的地球求生线，这样下来观感还不错。不是常规的灾难求生电影，还开了个比较大的脑洞，其实把这个脑洞扩展一下也不错
PS：一开始还以为是地心引力2呢。。。╮（╯▽╰）╭
最初以为是灾难片 想着罗兰对灾难片真是情有独钟啊 结果看着看着变科幻了 而且还是那种脱离现实基础的空想科幻 放十来年前还行 怪就怪诺兰的星际穿越太硬核了 导致后来科幻片不硬科幻都不好意思说自己是客户 而软科幻作品则尽可能让自己跟硬科幻作品撇清关系 结果这种不硬不软的作品看着真的尴尬
罗兰把之前的拿手作品和独立日续集的边角料攒成这样已经很不错了，还不忘对人工智能的反思，人类最终的灭绝也许就是毁于过度滥用的科技。
这边是合家欢 唯独男主前妻的现任老公和女主的前夫牺牲 这就有点无语了 其他的跟咱们流浪地球没啥区别 (偶然发现Charlie Plummer参演 不然这个题材分数直接就劝退了
看完才發現是賣拷貝導演的，運鏡很凌厲，前部分頗有《生死時速》的feel，但是丹尼這個人的設定有點大問題，搶過37次銀行卻十分不冷靜，暴躁行事。
非常套路的'災難片'，劇情槽點太多… 也就看看特效😂（松仁Titan_22/02/03）
PS：一开始还以为是地心引力2呢。。。╮（╯▽╰）╭
但实在是有太多没什么道理的剧情点
个人观感：《月球陨落》＜《不要抬头》。—— 上映前本来还期待是「罗兰·艾默里奇」的又一部《2012》《后天》《独立日》，结果只是又一部《独立日2：卷土重来》《史前一万年》。
7.2.虽然结局降智、炫技过多、文戏约为零，但依然阻挡不了我对爆炸贝始终如一的热爱。见长评。
爆炸贝的电影还是这么high爽，去爽一次就够了，没有二刷的必要。
7分。片子的概念还是不错的。只是梁子很简单，这么大（高）概念的片子配一个这样的梁子就会给人一种如《大鱼》一样的“不真实感”。介绍世界观的方式就和当年的《绿灯侠》一样不讨喜，也经不住进一步架构。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
