Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
3.5吧，还算比较不错的，气氛营造的还可以
不太行。女主的很多行为看不懂，女主的男朋友就是个撒比
“he probably just has a little crush on you” 男人心目中对crush的表达在接收端看来是一件多惊悚的事；电影对气氛的营造太棒了，看完之后坚定了我学拳击的决心（以及女主的男朋友…这个HE是你的救赎，要是女主真折了你最好忏悔一辈子
7分。为什么不拉窗帘？真所谓，就怕贼惦记。
一定要找到那个肯无条件信任你的人
从悬疑电影的角度来说是不太合格的，悬疑性紧迫感都差点。但你代入当下社会女性真实处境的时候，你便会在观影过程中感受到女主的那种压迫感不安全感。男主能共情合理化凶手的监视，却不能共情自己老婆的不安，这才是影片真正惊悚的地方！
结局女主牛逼！！！
Watcher.2022.REPACK.2160p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.HEVC
能猜到头的故事，让我想到了门锁，不过比门锁好看，简单不一定是坏事。
世界主流的题材，女性独居应该还是中国最安全。。。
如果这件事发生在现实生活中，或许我也会觉得女主有点小题大做。所以导演用这部影片告诉所有男人，任何时候都不要忽略一个女人的第六感，片尾女主的眼神已经传达了一切。
那种被凝视的感觉和毛骨悚然的紧张，从腿一路爬到脖子的凉气太真实了。 看的时候忍不住抽。 影片最真实的，就是塑造了一个男性凝视的世界，即使女主勇敢自信细心大胆，也没法避免被伤害。 梦露演技太好了。
20年前拍出来还行吧,有句台词不错,接受不确定的生活..
还行，氛围和镜头很赞，最后结局虽然有些不合理倒也颇具戏剧性。
就这???铺垫那么多就为了最后两枪?
挺好看，编剧营造了一种，他是坏人，他是好人，他是坏人，他是好人，他真的是坏人，逐渐剥开，由远及近，由假及真。
非常考验女主演技，从气质到着装到演技，都挺不错的
这电影拍的真省事，全片有内容的就最后二十分钟……前面一个多小时全是猜忌加漫无目的的空景，旅游宣传片了属于。
就这???铺垫那么多就为了最后两枪?
那些隐藏在真实生活中的罪恶，正如同电影中体现的那样，捉摸不定，含混不清，却又如影随形，绝大部分人，无法在生活中的罪恶发生之前锁定真凶，而身边人的猜疑和漠视，更是将受害人推入绝望的深渊。影片最后，女主虽然奇迹般地反杀，可那更像是导演为了宽慰观影者的心灵而编织的童话，反观现实，我们只能看到受害者的墓碑。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
