Middle class student Bob Letellier enters a new world when he meets Alain, a free-thinking rebel who, along with his group of young Parisians, has opted for a life of instant gratification instead of work and commitment. At a party, Bob meets a young woman, Mic, who appears to be just as carefree and cynical as Alain. Mic's only dream is to own a luxury car, and with Bob's help, she manages to find the money to but it. Mic's friend Clo discovers she is pregnant and, not knowing who the father is, she asks Bob to marry her. When they next meet at a party, Bob and Mic deny that they have any feelings for one another - a declaration that soon leads to tragedy...
Marcel Carné is widely regarded as one of the standard bearers of French quality cinema of the 1930s and 1940s, responsible for such masterpieces as Quai des brumes (1938) and Les Enfants du Paradis (1945). How ironic then that, in 1958, towards the end of his film-making career, he should make a film which dared to portray the attitudes and behaviour of the 1950s youth, in a way that effectively captures the mood and sentiment of the time.
Les Tricheurs was a hugely controversial film, not least because of its blatant depiction of adolescent free-love, and was even banned in some regions of France. It also received some intensely unfavourable reviews, most notably from the young hotheads on the Cahiers du cinéma such as François Truffaut who cited this film as a prime example of the decline of French cinema into mediocrity. In spite of all this negative press, the film proved to be an astonishing commercial success, attracting five million cinema-goers, and was awarded the Grand Prix du Cinéma français in 1958.
Whilst Les Tricheurs is not as flawless as Carné's earlier masterpieces, it is nonetheless a significant work, having the power to both shock and move its audience, whilst having great entertainment value. It evokes the mood of its time in a way that few French films of this period did, depicting young people as pleasure-seeking rebels, rejecting the austerity and discipline of the previous generation whilst pursuing a life without cares, responsibilities or love. Similarities with James Dean's films of the 1950s (most notably Rebel without a Cause) are apparent, although Carné's treatment of young people is far more abstract - in his film they merely symbolise a world that has lost its way, more or less victims of post-war prosperity. Although the young people in Les Tricheurs lack the authenticity to be totally credible, the film does make an important, and indeed quite disturbing point, about where the permissive society may be heading.
Much of the pleasure of the film is in the performances from its four lead actors, Jacques Charrier, Pascale Petit, Laurent Terzieff and Andréa Parisy, although only Terzieff is really convincing in his role. Marcel Carné originally considered Alain Delon and Jean-Paul Belmondo for the parts of Bob and Alain respectively, before opting for Charrier and Terzieff. As a consolation, Carné offered Belmondo a smaller part in the film - alas too small for the actor to be noticed by the public. Belmondo's breakthrough had to wait until the following year when he starred in Jean-Luc Godard's revolutionary A bout de souffle, a film which offers a very different perspective of the youth generation.
感觉是看完了一部像沙虫一样巨大的科幻剧的第一集。it's just the beginning... 很爽，氛围，色调，音乐，架构，极具宗教仪式感的一部电影，保持了那种宏大、广袤、空寂、哑然的巨大张力。罗马帝国式的框架，原住民驱离故土，勾结绞杀，望族陷落，弥赛亚降生...... 故事不精彩？重要吗😂。只是看到张震演这么个角色，挺憋屈。铁蜻蜓好评，沙虫够粗长大。
疫情以来第一次影院大片体验。1.张震成为了好莱坞大片史上中文口语的巅峰！维伦纽瓦这些年最大的进步就是电影里的中文进步了！从《降临》里Amy Adams关键时刻一秒出戏的外星“中文”，到《沙丘》里“玉也”医生的正常中文，胜却木兰无数。2.预告里渲染了半天的女主角其实只有一个MV的戏份。3.女祭司换蒸馏服的裸体镜头被删减了，可恶！这场戏原很重要，它代表母亲眼中的儿子已经是男人了，也铺垫了少年主角微妙的性觉醒。这部电影几乎没有停下来喘息的细腻的心理戏份，删残了这场戏，电影失色不少。4.男主父母教育理念不同，慈父对儿子无额外要求，虎妈要培养儿子做救世主。结果后来母子遇到杀虫的时候，甜茶摔倒落后了，虎妈独自在前面跑得可溜，都没回头看儿子一眼，遥遥领先，细思极恐。5.故事基本就是权力的游戏第一季写不下了
然后还是换皮瓦坎达，一群高科技人类还肉搏
说句不好听的，不好改编就别改编了，何必呢。。
活着的理由又增加一个。先五星送上，今年最爱的电影。
【A】IMAX2D,并不失望。原作本质上就是太空修仙题材的歌剧（不是），又回忆起了晚自习每天看沙丘的的那两周，曾经脑海中构想的扑翼机轮廓重现在荧幕上也是惊喜万分。我个人认为维伦纽瓦这次的表现还是令人满意的。虽然相比《降临》，在巨物奇观的视听营造上这次显得过于主动，稍微有点喧宾夺主的配乐把观众的情绪钉得太过死板，但依然弥足珍贵。至于节奏的问题，我认为弗兰克本身在处理进入沙漠的章节就是放缓拉开场域的，牛蛙倒是很还原地重现了这个部分，作为篇章的开幕，大量的奇观营造确实把我带入了原作的世界，但是这种从人偏移到景观的视点，会不会在下一部作品中产生更大的摩擦还得看牛蛙的发挥，牛蛙作了一部精美的预告，优秀的场域和图纸已经展开，之后画笔要如何在流动的沙丘上起舞更是令人期待。
注定会两极分化的片子。不是烂片，音乐和沙漠极致震撼，但故事和内核也不达预期，都8000年后了，还在搞中世纪血缘继承那一套，女人还蒙着面纱，军队在用冷兵器在那儿一对一搏杀，那人类文明8000年发展了个寂寞。ps：这个片子告诉我们绿色有多重要，一片灰黄的沙漠真是让人抑郁和窒息。张震的戏份少得可怕，就2分钟炮灰。
三星半吧，美术、摄影、配乐以及音效都做了各自力所能及的，但以我对维伦纽瓦的期待和标准，我是略感失望的。维伦纽瓦大可以做得更紧绷更有酷劲儿，又或者干脆就像泰伦斯·马力克一样彻底滑向诗意和意识流——不得不说那么多慢镜、旁白、大远景，马力克的味儿太冲了——但我只看到维伦纽瓦被巨大的投资和繁靡的文本捆住了手脚，不上不下得抛出一卷脱俗但又没那么脱俗的好莱坞A级“史诗”。维伦纽瓦之前常被诟病强视听、弱文本，可实际上这是我头一次真的感到他被文本给拖住了。
在这个“星期五为未来”的时代，在这个把自然当作新神灵崇拜的时代，维伦纽埃拍出了一部恋物癖的作品。人的先知都失败了，人在争夺对物的控制权，但最终的方案是人顺应巨大的沙虫，go with the flow。“人新世”下的自然诗歌，作者们都试图把自己写入自然，创造出人与自然的共生体，在这种哲学下，不应把物当作崇拜的对象，正如维伦纽埃在这里做的那样，因为在崇拜这种动作下，人依然占有对物的最终解释权。
把全片的慢镜头减掉，时长能缩短三分之一（笑）。影片的服化道和场景都很有质感很用心，有史诗级电影的感觉了。男主搭配那个发型也挺帅的。前半段还挺好看的，后半段可能是在沙漠里就有点点枯燥了。应该不会二刷，期待下一部。手动3.5。
声音大得震耳朵，猝不及防就结束了，甜茶实在太帅了，把男生都掰弯了，看这个电影最大的收获就是知道了，这个世界上没有直男！他说，如果是甜茶这样的，可🉑！！！
看完满脑子都是背景嗡嗡嗡声的沙漠，非常汉斯季默+维伦纽瓦。总的来说挺看人的电影，原著粉表示满足，新观众梦境部分可能云里雾里（其实这已经是原作最不神道的部分剧情了），不过看看沙漠奇观也可以嘛；改名叫沙丘1或者沙丘上可能对路人观众好一点。凯恩斯这角色改编的挺莫名其妙的，为了zzzq么？
非常丹尼斯维伦纽瓦。想不起来上次在大银幕看到五幕式是什么时候了，不过这也不是导演第一次用五幕式。他算是一个很会用声音的导演。连续剧式的拍法难免令人不爽，但不论是视听语言，还是在美学上同样融合了复古与未来的美术设计，都令我无法不喜欢。
三星半吧，美术、摄影、配乐以及音效都做了各自力所能及的，但以我对维伦纽瓦的期待和标准，我是略感失望的。维伦纽瓦大可以做得更紧绷更有酷劲儿，又或者干脆就像泰伦斯·马力克一样彻底滑向诗意和意识流——不得不说那么多慢镜、旁白、大远景，马力克的味儿太冲了——但我只看到维伦纽瓦被巨大的投资和繁靡的文本捆住了手脚，不上不下得抛出一卷脱俗但又没那么脱俗的好莱坞A级“史诗”。维伦纽瓦之前常被诟病强视听、弱文本，可实际上这是我头一次真的感到他被文本给拖住了。
美轮美奂，完全长在我审美点上的作品，像看完了一个精美的艺术展，全程目不暇接，生怕错过每一帧，面对这样的作品我无法客观
剧情上文戏虽然很多，节奏也偏慢，但行之有效，戏剧张力很强，毕竟要把小说里许多庞大而繁杂的世界观交代清楚，太不容易！人家英文片名也带有Part One，就是个序，真的大戏必在后头。
引人入胜，让人想起《降临》。这个导演不是在拍电影，是在把哲学影像化。
感觉才刚刚进入正题就结束了，这根本是序章吧😅
真无聊。。。10191年，科技也没什么进步。BIBLE未来外星版，救世主他爸演过JESUS的人间爸，成心吧？
宏大的世界观，第二部还要等多久？配乐非常出彩。甜茶可真俊！大沙虫子的设定以前看过，但这么巨型的还是第一次看到。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
