Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
这个系列还真像星战后传。在本该回收前几部伏线的大结局里突然引入了新的大boss（帕尔帕庭和生物科技公司）。最刺激的一幕还是海报上的城市追逐戏。以及真的很不喜欢这种为了让霸王龙出场而出场、为了让它赢而赢，这部的斗兽戏拍得太差了。
一个直面过去，告别过去，存封过去，鼓起勇气再爱
这是一个夜晚的故事
given，真的好看，它给我的力量啊，平添生活三分乐
佩奇一直喜欢女神姐姐，结果慢慢喜欢上了“平平无奇”的妹妹AJ，甚至发现发现AJ就是那个让她背锅的涂鸦艺术家。
很棒的电影！无论是色彩还是配乐，出拼图很适合的电影！
更令人捉急的是对面还有一个应该很会谈恋爱却选择全程神游天外的真冬。真心建议你们还是做朋友吧。爱情注定完蛋，友谊地久天长。
嗯～～～我还挺喜欢这个片子的，里面对青春的描写很不错，还有我发现我对女生同性可以接受，但是男生的就感觉很恐怖了～是不是有点歧视～～～
蛮好看的！总算有一部不是走“伤痕”路线的百合青少年电影。其实百合电影也和普通异性恋爱情一样，并不是全部都是悲伤！这一点非常赞！gooooooood👍❤️
剧情大概是新老主角团相遇之后才变得有趣的，前面差点给我看睡着了💤
虽然我很爱given但……这部真的莫名其妙。立夏不谈恋爱时是个完美的人，一谈恋爱成了一个一惊一乍的白痴。更令人捉急的是对面还有一个应该很会谈恋爱却选择全程神游天外的真冬。真心建议你们还是做朋友吧。爱情注定完蛋，友谊地久天长。
6/10，抱着最低预期来看这部电影，其实我倒觉得这部远远强于第二部，侏罗纪世界整体系列:1>3>2。
虽然剧情有些老套，但里面的精彩段子真是目不暇接啊
沧女士就那丢丢戏份导演你看看合适嘛？？？三颗星全靠情怀加持，要不就一工业废料…
虽说是讲恐龙和人类如何共存，但恐龙几乎都成了配角，开篇固定串场的沧龙，霸王龙镜头也少的可怜，新出现的恐龙也是寥寥几个镜头，变异蝗虫倒是出场不少，可以明显感觉到编剧对于故事脉络和情节几乎没有脑力编下去了，反派头头忒像库克智商超高但全是弱鸡，是不是意有所指？寻回小蓝宝宝的波折让新老一波侏罗纪主角们回归，到底是情怀占了大部分观感，恐龙世界这样暂时落下帷幕真觉得不够满意啊！
没有被甜到 还是替立夏难过。尽管“琴是由纪留下的 琴弦是立夏修好的” 怎么能轻而易举就接纳你和你的过去，所以说和有这样沉重又漫长的过去的人谈恋爱，好难真正的幸福啊。不过现实中，应该很多人都是等着别人来救赎自己吧。
管他那些黑子怎么喷，我就是觉得五星好片！！！！看的4D，爽
反派头目的造型是库克那样，内涵了啥嘛？当看效果好了~毕竟也被几次吓得叫出声来
为了虐，人物可以非常敏感，沉溺于过去的情绪中（前男友），也可以非常迟钝，无感于此刻在身边的人（现男友），这种对不同人物的同一类情感／行为的选择性反应，让角色不可信甚至不可理解，故事也就可笑了。
有些无趣 觉得只有里面的画很好看 画真的都好好看！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
