A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
迪士尼想拍另一套類似「魔盜王」的系列，但The Rock畢竟太「正氣」，令主角看起來很「生硬」。場面則是不惜工本，娛樂效果合格有餘。
作为冒险喜剧动作片来说我觉得很不错，虽然还是比不上《夺宝奇兵》系列，不过迪斯尼出品的风格往往适合带小孩子看，本片有着吓人但是不血腥的场景，好笑又刺激的动作场面，动听的背景音乐，吸引小朋友的神话传说，非常适合暑期档，值得一看哦，另外，此片不在大屏幕上看完全体会不到电影的魅力！
3星半 好看啊 要鼓励多拍这种类型的片啊 迪士尼还是迪士尼 cool
不错的合家欢电影。不过作为老牌殖民国家的英国，这样挤兑西班牙人和德国人有点不地道。
好老套……还不是好看的那种。男女主角毫无cp感，看得全程尴尬。低配版夺宝奇兵+加勒比海盗。早知如此，何必当初和戴普叔解约呢
还行，无功无过，女主的性格我有点受不了，充满自然冒险和传说故事色彩的影片
成龙喜剧。巧合总是如齿轮咬合的机关般精巧，而危机正是被这种杂技般的动作解决的，与一惊一乍的“过山车”桥段有所区别。
妥妥的暑期合家欢视效爽片，引进的话应该能轻松盆满钵满吧。。巨石和艾米莉布朗特都特别适合各自的角色，但互动更像战友，最后这强行组CP，有点磕不到。。
看这个电影的感觉和去迪士尼一摸一样。一开始：“哇好好玩细节做的好真！”，到后面“怎么还没排到我！我已经看够了等候区！”（这个电影但凡缩掉30分钟都能多一颗星）
ps：那个小豹子真可爱 喜欢 （说实话比我预期的好看）
那个时候就想看一部无脑欢乐无关情爱的（或者说不过多）
《怒火攻心》+《约翰威克》，说不定是今年所有女性主打动作片里最喜欢的一部。大卫·雷奇虽然只是担任制片人的角色，但全片都充斥着他百试不爽的霓虹灯审美和血浆残暴风动作戏，被注入剧毒病入膏肓的设定倒是一定程度弥补或说明演员非职业出身的不足。《疾速》系列这几年也慢慢快发展成了一套公式，不过这种比谁残暴和玩命的风气总归还是要比手持镜头和快速剪辑看起来舒服。以及主战场设在日本也没拍出什么新鲜感，连选角都是那么毫不意外。
剧情太弱智简单了，台词也水的不行，男女主角也不来电，整体毫无亮点可说。1114-晚
痕迹明显的棚拍片，打光很人工，试图在棚里展现亚马逊风光？电影版的迪士尼乐园？打打吵吵闹闹。
两亿美元大片，7分钟片尾字幕足以显示了。
不用带脑子，图个乐子轻轻松松看完——简称，平庸
剧中德国佬说jungle的时候，美国人听了几遍都没懂啥意思，跟老外说jungle的时候我也让他重复了好几遍一模一样。哈哈哈哈哈哈德语世界的人是不是都说不好这个词啊。
看着玩儿。
有点像加勒比海盗，但还是很欢快的，说明这个类型与逻辑还是容易吸引观众的
冲着演员阵容和霓虹元素看的 女主没有想象中帅气 小太妹也没有想象中给力 所以解药呢 结局不喜欢 boom柠檬饮料广告？感觉像吹一个气球然后撒气 音乐都还不错
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
