Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
怎么有哥斯拉大战金刚和毒液那味……这是我娃说的。
哭死我了 看的是我的童年啊 音乐剧桥段和很多致敬的桥段不错！
故事三星，特效五星，综合四星吧！动画人加油！！！
节奏很不错，配乐也好，中间还弄了一段歌舞表演，动画片来说很不错了，好于很多大片了
闺女第一次进电影院，那么喜欢看熊出没的她看到后面都感觉不好看，以前在家陪她看的那些剧场版比起来都比这部有意思，这不就是套着熊二皮的套路片吗……（那些天天拿熊孩子说事的玩意儿，其实更讨厌的是那些带着孩子来看电影却在旁边玩手机的缺德玩意儿，就这些人养出来的孩子也好不了）
有几个镜头还算是可以接受，算是比较正常的完成了春节档人民和国家交付的每年一部儿童动画片的任务，以上……
中国工业电影在技术上感觉问题不大了。
第一次的亲子电影耶 小朋友还看不太懂 我们三个大人全程看的津津有味
前半段叙事太散了，拼拼凑凑的，后半段就顺畅很多了
第一次陪童看3D！全程还是有内容的，但是套路化，熊二拯救时，有点和两种哥斯拉在打一样，整体不错的。
确实技术还可以，但是故事真的非常无聊，当然小孩子还是挺喜欢的。甜姐也长大了，估计这是最后一次看熊出没了吧。
虽然很多梗是老的，但作为一个不属于80后的IP电影，陪孩子看一次竟然发现还不错
太爽了，要剧情有剧情，要特效有特效，每年春节质量最稳定的就是熊出没大电影，无脑看就对了！！！
作为科幻电影的话，剧本也不够好，仍然有些低幼，没有原创的科幻点，像是很多电影的拼盘
即使剧情很俗套，甚至有些尴尬。但是我仍然看到了《熊出没》这个IP的进步。从一开始的狗熊岭冒险，到现在的赛博朋克打怪。纵观全片，也不难看出致敬了许多经典电影。最重要的是，结尾真的让我感动了。
陪小黑妹看电影，她爸比看得最带劲……男生真的是对带科技感、未来感的po战无底线地着迷吗？Confused...这可是熊出没ε=(´ο｀*)))唉
不好！前半段还行，后半段变成奥特曼互打了，毫无意义，太拖沓了
有剧情有特效有打斗有教育意义，这不比隔壁几部好看？
怪不得片头像漫威呢，原来是部超级英熊电影啊
果然最宝贵的就是知慧啊！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
