The subject of Danièle Huillet and Jean-Marie Straub’s Der Tod des Empedokles (The Death of Empedocles, 1987) is the Greek pre-Socratic philosopher Empedocles (c. 490 BC – 430 BC), who lived in the Greek colony of Agrigentum in Sicily. His theories are mentioned in several of Plato’s dialogues. He maintained that all matter is made up of four irreducible elements: water, earth, air and fire. A mystic and a poet, he is considered to be the founder of classical rhetoric. He is also thought to be the last Greek philosopher to write in verse; two fragments of his works survive: Katharmoi (Purifications) and Peri Phuseôs (On Nature). An advocate of democracy, he came into conflict with his fellow citizens of Agrigentum and, as result, was banished with his young disciple, Pausanius. When he was asked to return, he preferred to commit suicide by throwing himself into the active volcano at Mount Aetna.
The German writer Friedrich Hölderlin wrote two versions of Der Tod des Empedokles in 1798 and 1800, and a final third version in 1820, all three ultimately unfinished. They were conceived as five-act tragedies and all three differ in plot. According to Michael Hamburger, Hölderlin’s English-language translator,
the main reason why Hölderlin finished no version of the play must be that he remained too closely identified with Empedocles, at the very period in his life when his own view of the poet as philosopher, prophet and priest – and as tragic hero – was subject to perpetual crisis and re-examination.
Huillet-Straub’s The Death of Empedocles is based on Hölderlin’s first version (the longest of the three), whereas Black Sin is based on the third version.
不当悬疑片看其实剧情还可以 但是为什么这个系列翻拍任何国家的作品都要放到泰国去 泰国又做错了什么
对这种振聋发聩似的想要让你哭的电影完全无感，但是肖央挺好的。
这片跟它吐槽的网络大电影一样，开头整个酷炫镜头，结尾来个临场感上价值，掐头去尾中间就可以胡整了，要煽情，上一段慢镜头mv，要冲突，警察内部搞个正邪对立，要反转，李治廷一出来就猜到七七八八了。一年到头贺岁档就看这个挺没劲儿的，比第一部诚意差太远了，全片透着陈思诚那鸡贼劲儿，也就肖央的表演能看。
算是很成熟的国产类型片了，可惜这种题材也只能把背景搬到国外。
泰国的市长不好当啊，泰国的警察不听话啊，泰国的话也没人讲啊
故事不合理，内涵不深刻。泰国？: ) 有点无奈，有点可爱。
肖央是个天生的演员，除此之外我还能说啥？噢，类型片就别硬烘感情了吧，太尬了，麻利点。镜头除开头建置几无足观。人物关系的“对仗”真是太过简单化的处理。编剧没少夹带私货，一场yy的营救。问和阿尔帕西诺的差距。
误杀的延续，虽然是翻拍另一个剧本，节奏故事完成度还不错！
另外，在泰国拍戏的香港演员努力说普通话真有点搞笑。
这是昭和这一辈社会运动比较激烈的人创作出的故事，到2022年再看，仅剩对真实世界的嘲笑
神经病 陈思诚让这个片子变得不幸 萤火虫是什么好东西啊我的天呐 给你用的 中国人说中国话！
原版有一个很精彩的剧本，通过人物间的互动，人物的行为，四两拨千斤地暴露美国蓝领的生存困境，每个转折都是美国“系统性”的问题，Denzel细腻柔韧的表演塑造了一个教父式的人物，很精彩。
虽然，没有第一部好看。但是依旧是一部完成度很高同期没有更好看的电影的作品。不得不感慨一句：文咏珊的资源太好啦。
比电影更垃圾的是陈狗这个人！但是他真的知道观众要什么。受苦受难的中国人啊…[C-]
正好上映这天儿子生日，看着儿子开心得大叫，仿佛看到了年幼时看机器猫的自己，必须好评
超出预期，看完彩蛋瞬间泪奔，有多少人不希望自己的人生只是一场戏呢？只是看完之后更不敢生孩子了…
超出预期，看完彩蛋瞬间泪奔，有多少人不希望自己的人生只是一场戏呢？只是看完之后更不敢生孩子了…
果然有了陈思成就是烂的标志…误杀1有多惊喜这个2就有多无聊…跟名字毫无关系的逻辑站不住脚的大拼盘，莫名其妙的自我感动和不合时宜的玩笑，让人坏足了胃口。行了 知道陈思成你看过1000部电影了，可姐看过3000部了。告辞…
最后半小时才变得有趣起来 最大收获：复习了一遍世界近代史，中国近代史。
全是上一部的成功套路，但是节奏不太好，为了剧情多翻几番牺牲了挺多东西。每个人物都是出场即巅峰，做完他这个人物需要为剧情做的推动后，就开始莫名其妙。工具人不是不可以写，随便写。但是工具人推动完剧情之后，基本都没能继续合理地继续到后续的剧情逻辑里面。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
