Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
最近主旋律进步的地方：拿人当人，拿敌人也当人。战争不是士兵挑起的，是多种历史原因促成的，将军背上的是国家利益，士兵只是被卷入战争的活生生的人而已。
很喜欢的一个点是，战役从来不仅仅是的英雄主义无畏牺牲，更多的是科技军备和战略谋划，自甘做炮灰的一腔孤勇，在铸就胜利者的勋章中远远不够。而电影里就有很多军事谋略的体现，排兵布阵，临场应变，上到带队的将领，下到一线士兵，带着智慧和热血前赴后继。
总之，这片子从题材上就拧巴。
整体比前作流畅，也更残酷，但是我更喜欢前作那些动人的情节。
热泪盈眶，心情久久难平。
演员方面，和众多老戏骨飙起戏来，不得不承认，四字演技越发成熟，真的不错。
春节档场面最大的电影，没有之一。
不知道是剧本还是拍摄表现方式，显得整部电影有点怪。电影最后恢复七连建制时候哭成一头猪，回去要再看一遍士兵突击。
突突突大场面很多，文戏有点看不进去，导致观影过程中我的悲伤情绪大部分不是源于爱国主义情怀而是小家小爱，当然两者没有谁比谁更高贵，就感觉编剧和导演可以做的更好吧。
美军不管输赢，都是丢人丢到家了，完全不对等的战争，无耻至极。
2011.11.11 居然还有下一部吗 蹲一个 2022.2.20 第22.2万人看过 在1090看的 伍万里的成长线真让人心疼 一开始大家都在 一开始大家都意气风发 到最后全员be了 “七连应到157人，实到1人！”
不过文化软实力也是实力……
韩东君被坦克反复碾压的时候，我的心也被碾压了
牛逼牛逼
（华夏影城长沙龙湾商业广场店）陪长辈去影院看完了这部电影，第一感觉就是真的太长了，电影叙事大逻辑含糊，很拖拉。说实在的，剧情、画面、演员的演技特效都可以，就真的是太拖拉了。原本以为结束了，又整一个小高潮，高潮完了想着终于要结束了吧，md又来一个刺点，转折太多都有点看腻了。另外最后是哪位大佬把三位指导导的戏合在一起的？敢情是谁也不想得罪么，电影结尾就是三位导演的三段结尾生接在一起，甚至看风格就知道哪一段结局是哪一位大佬的风格。最后一段结局结束的时候的结尾音乐也是很硬，和画面不相融。整体来看，从画面、演技来看，给电影四星，剧情拖拉扣一星，综合三星。
怎么讲呢，我个人还是喜欢徐克的志怪电影，西游宇宙或者狄仁杰宇宙都ok，体现他磅礴的想象力，而从智取威虎山开始，他似乎就开始转型了，而且相当成功，想象力变得更厉害了。
看完电影出来，发现俄罗斯已经把乌克兰揍趴下了，瞬间有种不真实的感觉，这个世界真梦幻
牺牲那么多英雄战士，最后桥还是被联军运输机吊来的两块钢板修好了，气愤！
如今再也没有哪个国家敢随意践踏我们的领空。
从来没得岁月静好
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
