Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
殖民主义、帝国主义、资本主义的矛盾与恶性竞争哪去了，这么一拍整个一战反倒成了自家的家里问题，成了小家子气的小打小闹，可谓是给历史的一记面目全非脚，这种意淫非但不助于人们理解历史，反倒会曲解和使历史感与真正的历史问题及其严肃性彻底消失，沦为资本商业化的消遣与消费产品。
比预想的好看，没有惊悚的特效，但是故事很富戏剧性。谁是好人，谁是坏人，应该相信谁？一切就在一个小小的警局里展开。
下一部怕是就要讲苏联和纳粹如何发动二战了吧？呵呵，等三年后美国死了，我们一定要把这个锅给美国来背，包括奥斯维辛集中营，都要说成是他们协助纳粹建的（说不定还真的是呢）
一些场景还是很紧张惊悚的。但作为一个持枪国家，这部电影里面的每一个着制服的美国警察，都毫无安全意识。女警把手枪指着犯人的头、陌生人坐在警局的位置里在问你是谁、看到遍地弹壳还不想着持枪戒备。男二也是非要到烟雾弥漫的浴室追击职业杀手而不是选择视线好的区域，女警打了肾上腺素能跑能跳就是不愿意去拿个重火力带把手枪坐着等，而且女警也太多问题了到最后还在问男一包里有什么。真的是看的我直跳脚，前面铺垫一大堆的内幕也不了了之。
我还是get不到黄人为什么要替毛爹破防www 马修风格也没变还是胡说八道黑遍所有，可能黑美黑德的时候被当作理所当然了叭
3/5。看着拉尔夫费因斯一把年纪费劲的演着，出于对他的喜爱，多给一个🌟。大反派没有好好写只是做了类型处理，很二yuan论，也许符合的是当时的逻辑？治腿和对打拉斯普丁那一段其实拍的趣味横生，壮汉芭蕾这么搭配原来也可。为了子嗣重新“做人”这个概念太古典了，大概只能在宣扬不要撒谎要做绅士一夫一妻的p**国，catho国家人士看了大概会说，我外面的情f还有几个儿子呢………感觉这是部先导片，续集还在后面排队？
啥啊这是…除了公路上美丽的星空啥也没记住…
没有上一部领袖水准发挥的好 最好的段落竟然出现在一个半路杀出来的杀手身上…两位大男主站着就把钱给赚了…
俄罗斯大仙跳舞打架真是不错的暴力美学。不过对过去的战争题材不太感兴趣。结尾的彩蛋列宁和希特勒？？？
目前IMDB评分6.6/2.8K票，字幕已完成，转战下一个
这电影如果能高分，豆瓣是啥水平不用说了吧😅
刚开始看着真牛逼啊 各种阴谋 各种坏蛋大乱战 结尾反而有点泄气了
各怀鬼胎的各路人物汇聚于警察局，但是不知道哪里出了毛病，本应精彩纷呈的相互牵制加巧妙外因推动的剧情却如同白开水。你会迷茫于各色人物的行为逻辑中，甚至发生了什么都没搞清楚。试图用留白加强点悬念，却因为糟糕的节奏让人根本就不在乎，或者说。。。卖弄之前，观众就猜中了结局而已。
很有意思的设置，但是入题很慢，犹如箭在弦上，却迟迟不发射。
爆米花电影也称不上劲爆啊，总差那么一口气没让人爽起来
情节忽略不计 主要看枪战 可惜只有一场不错 其余都很垃圾
奥国大公脑有残，德皇自幼手震颤，美国总统召娼妓，俄国邪神毁江山。英伦父子不一般，维护和平重任担，小店深藏功与名，牛逼尽在金士曼。
对话不够精彩，剧情也伴随着无聊，转折没有意思。
看着还行，节奏也不错，但总感觉差点意思，又说不上来是哪里。
陷落哥陷落系列。最后决战男主在火力体力占尽优势，且战且退有点扯犊子。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
