Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
确实挺特色的，封建脸谱那一套，不过故事还是不行…
2县太爷，府尹。官越大，越贪。
又是女性觉醒的话题，一次意外绑架的发生加速女主对有钱丈夫的不满和控诉……如果没有绑匪的出现pua破日子还可以凑合过下去……希区柯克悬疑惊悚brilliant
肤浅的我需要一个超长解析～ 婚姻中还是需要互相尊重！很多细节细思极恐…
3星最多了
《天书奇谭》当然是一部很不错的动画片，比《哪吒之魔童降世》要强很多，但似乎被捧得太高了。这里的一个重要原因，是袁公的形象，符合八十年代知识分子的自我想象，孤傲，怀才不遇，只有自己才能救苍生……当然，现在我们都知道了，实际情况和知识分子的自我想象相去甚远，也许犬儒才是知识分子的主要特征。
又是女性觉醒的话题，一次意外绑架的发生加速女主对有钱丈夫的不满和控诉……如果没有绑匪的出现pua破日子还可以凑合过下去……希区柯克悬疑惊悚brilliant
女狐狸：桃花，乱花渐欲迷人眼，胭脂水粉惑人心。
这一系列的动画片我小时候看的时候都觉得很恐怖的。 还有个十二生肖题材的 内容就是每个小动物为打怪都死了 但是死法每个都不一样 ，，我每天放学回家 都等着看今天的小动物是怎么被黑风老妖虐死。。
【8.0】#siff2019#留在记忆里就好了，这次重温的观感其实并不好，虽然我真的超爱上美了。但是，这次重看感觉叙事方面不太好，片子整体在上美的作品里也算是比较低龄的了，偏重于嘻笑打闹吧。所以留在回忆里就好～
结局意料之外，但大快人心。漫画版的电影海报里的女主，跟实际相差甚远。整部电影里，女主是唯一顺眼的。最后才发现她不仅美貌，而且原来还藏着智慧，勇敢。唯一的可以在危机崩溃时，一直控制住自己。这是影片最大特色吧，只有女人的应对是完美的，而且是自然的。不是啥其他电影里的高智商，高战斗力的什么的，就很生活很自然，不抓马但最后却最具有戏剧性，真实生活不就这样么，血腥性往往超越电影。反观故事里的每一个男性，都属于随处可见那种日常自负吧，不深究可以，深究起来，每个人都有令人恶心的一面。
🎭演员表现：
如果单论剧本和设定，感觉还不错：人物与自身的冲突以及与外界的冲突都有，表现夫妻矛盾的关键点也有，比如妻子也知道的Debbie，包里的避孕药，丈夫满不在乎让妻子去色诱劫匪……最后也有出乎意料的反转。但是电影太拖沓了，而且因为场景局限，要表现各人物的矛盾和情绪转变就必须靠演绎和大量对白铺垫，但对白除了富豪外都极其单薄。如果做成一集单元剧可能效果都要好得多。
看4K修复最大的感受就是，现在怎么就没有了呢，怎么就没有了呢……
反派又怂又傻又没智商，他枪没在手上的每一分我都在期待反杀，结果所有人一直在那里唧唧歪歪。美人计也好扯。两个成年人肉搏都能干掉反派，结果一直水了一个半小时，我还以为男女主之一和反派有背后交易才一直不反杀。最后的结局极其没意思，又无聊又没劲。我看有个评论说讽刺说应该反派黑人。我忽然想笑，反派绑匪是黑人，女主换成亚裔，那才是齐活儿了。
能感受到想表达什么，但是太生硬和不聪明了。
我想说的是，系不好鞋带就穿一脚蹬，拿钱就走人，对谁都好！
小时侯是个终极fans,从书到动画片还有磁带,一应俱全
开头三个人的台词和行为都很逗比！中间开始有点剧情转变，园丁这家伙摔一跤把自己给插死我是真无语😓这个设定有点扯……
这样伪科学、反廉政、毁三观的动画真的适合孩子看吗？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
