Future of Food In the past year, we have seen food riots on three continents, food inflation has rocketed and experts predict that by 2050, if things don't change, we will see mass starvation across the world. This film sees George Alagiah travel the world in search of solutions to the growing global food crisis. From the two women working to make their Yorkshire market town self-sufficient to the academic who claims it could be better for the environment to ship in lamb from New Zealand, George Alagiah meets the people who believe they know how we should feed the world as demand doubles by the middle of the century.
【India】
George joins a Masai chief among the skeletons of hundreds of cattle he has lost to climate change and the English farmer who tells him why food production in the UK is also hit. He spends a day eating with a family in Cuba to find out how a future oil shock could lead to dramatic adjustments to diets. He visits the breadbasket of India to meet the farmer who now struggles to irrigate his land as water tables drop, and finds out why obesity is spiralling out of control in Mexico.
Back in Britain, George investigates what is wrong with people's diets, and discovers that the UK imports an average of 3000 litres of water per capita every day. He talks to top nutritionist Susan Jebb, DEFRA minister Hilary Benn and Nobel laureate Rajendra Pachauri to uncover what the future holds for our food.
【Senegal】
George heads out to India to discover how a changing diet in the developing world is putting pressure on the world's limited food resources. He finds out how using crops to produce fuel is impacting on food supplies across the continents. George then meets a farmer in Kent, who is struggling to sell his fruit at a profit, and a British farmer in Kenya who is shipping out tonnes of vegetables for our supermarket shelves. He also examines why so many people are still dying of hunger after decades of food aid.
Back in the UK, George challenges the decision-makers with the facts he has uncovered - from Oxfam head of research Duncan Green to Sainsbury's boss Justin King. He finds out why British beef may offer a model for future meat production and how our appetite for fish is stripping the world's seas bare.
【Cuba】
In the final episode George Alagiah heads out to Havana to find out how they are growing half of their fruit and vegetables right in the heart of the city, investigates the 'land-grabs' trend - where rich countries lease or buy up the land used by poor farmers in Africa - and meets the Indian agriculturalists who have almost trebled their yields over the course of a decade.
George finds out how we in this country are using cutting-edge science to extend the seasons recycle our food waste and even grow lettuce in fish tanks to guarantee the food on our plates.
He hears the arguments about genetically modified food and examines even more futuristic schemes to get the food on to our plates.
第一个单元吴京《乘风的拍摄视角和叙述方式真的太惊艳了呜呜呜，第二个单元章子怡的《诗》直接戳爆泪点呜呜呜，好喜欢那句“生命是用来燃烧的东西， 死亡是验证生命的东西，宇宙是让死亡渺小的东西。渺小的尘埃，是宇宙的开始，平凡的渺小，是伟大的开始。”
沈腾执导的《少年行》继续延续了搞笑风格，聚集了开心麻花团队的中坚力量，惊喜不断。
影片有些普通了，格局忽大忽小
丹尼尔版应该是历代邦德中故事最有串联性的了吧，从《幽灵党》就在把之前的每一部纳入整体叙事，一路看下来也算有始有终了。五部电影，邦德像在做一次漫长的心理治疗，终于在落幕时治愈了他的trust issue。几个吐槽点：比反派动机更莫名其妙的毒药设定，不合剧情的主题曲歌词，以及我真没想到这部还会出现vesper，可是编剧你是多大仇人家都死了八百年还要把墓炸了？
看的点映，只能给7分，吴京和徐峥的还不错，章子怡的差强人意，沈腾当导演还是稚嫩了点
除了章子怡外都延续了鲜明的导演风格，硬汉、市民、无厘头。四个关于民族、国家、时代和未来的故事。两悲两喜，先悲后喜，好像赚足眼泪后又逗你开心。画面从残旧衰败到现代科幻，情绪的反差、画面的反差，让故事更深刻。许多细节更是细腻，《诗》中哥哥带着妹妹放完孔明灯后站在妹妹身后捂住妹妹耳朵大哭的一幕简直催泪瓦斯。
喜爱程度:
徐峥果然承包了我的笑点😂
较好：<诗><鸭先知>
个人观感：《我和我的祖国》＞《我和我的家乡》≈《我和我的父辈》。—— 章子怡《诗》＞吴京《乘风》≈ 徐峥《鸭先知》＞沈腾《少年行》：还以为这是沈腾第一次当导演拍的影视作品？原来他导过一部叫《人见人爱》的剧。——《我和我的祖国》徐峥《夺冠》＞《我和我的家乡》徐峥《最后一课》＞《我和我的父辈》徐峥《鸭先知》。
能不能不要再做微电影拼盘儿了？短片不能当作电影啊，没情感铺垫没有故事递进真的不行啊亲们。求求了
四个单元各有优缺点，但整体还算比较饱满，总结起来就一句话，这个系列终于结束了...
终于，他死了，死的像个人
开头最好看 中间部分为了引出新人简直不能更拖沓 直接导致邦德死的那段观众松了一口气 总算要剧终了 多一颗星给蓝眼睛的Daniel 他开始接手的时候私以为颜值配不上这个角色 这么多年看习惯了也挺好 能那么自律保持身材演动作戏太不容易了 这是一任看起来做事就很认真的邦德
较好：<诗><鸭先知>
主旋律很不容易拍出惊喜。勉强合格吧。很多时候剧情很尴尬。四不像，电影行业的拼多多，东拼西凑，为了拍电影而拍。鸭子是吃鱼的吗？我真不知道。
声效很惊人，剧情太套路，还非要政治正确，大片思路，但感觉不咋滴。情怀拉满又如何？
诗 > 鸭先知 > 乘风 = 及格线 > 少年行，有惊喜也有不足，整体还是达到预期了。章子怡拍的部分共情力很强，诗作为连接逝者与生者的桥梁，所承载的意义可以很深远。徐峥拍的部分视觉风格确实很有借鉴原作的感觉，观感上也很舒适，用略带夸张的方式展示勇于探索创新的第一代人。吴京拍的部分属实是太平常的抗战片了，也不是不好，但整个故事太扁平直白化。沈腾拍的部分就真的是大杂烩下的灾难，许多元素汇在一起，却没有一个元素突出为亮点，庸俗而冗杂。
其实前面两个小时的多场动作戏非常带劲，对比之下终极大战显得异常孱弱，以至于完结的有些莫名其妙。凯瑞·福永可能把拍电视剧的习惯带到电影里来了，如果砍掉四十分钟，本片可能会变成本届007的完美谢幕。艳光四射的安娜·德·阿玛斯本来是最大的亮点，没想到竟然惊鸿一瞥后再没出现，难道是为下一届的正牌邦女郎做铺垫？奥斯卡影帝作为幕后大boss，开头被神秘地渲染过了头，结果结尾仓促赴死，面具人成了工具人。又一个007告别影史，面对着碟中谍等系列部部创新的强大压力，新版如何重启，并不乐观。
为了给丹尼尔的詹姆斯·邦德来个完美的落幕，编了一个很复杂的故事，各方势力都登场，最后的结局是挺悲壮而没必要。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
