A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
这应该就是暗黑版童话故事吧。如果是格林兄弟，会不会把这个改编成另一个世界名著童话故事呢。
痛苦中的温度
老女巫不要那么丑就观感不会这么不舒服，4:5的画框比例很有年代感，文艺片、诗电影，不是什么恐怖片，更像是诗意地真实描述在那个年代生存的不易和爱的难得，最后通过新旧女巫的不同对比，爱的羁绊原来如此微妙而感人。
3.5，过于文艺，台词、旁白很少，但前期台词根本看不懂，过程中视听感受中你总能体会到些什么，大自然的原始，看到最后更像是部治愈片
也就只是一周口碑榜的片子了。导演有点贪心，好像什么都想讲，最终却又好像什么都没讲清楚、没讲好。所以，导演到底想干嘛？
诗意十足，叙事性差了些，而且老女巫造型没必要弄成那么恶心。
对不起，没看完。感觉优势女性主义+女巫+艺术摄影的套路。这种话题我真的会谢
手持镜头的晃荡，没有心脏的不同人生，诗意的台词
节奏缓慢的文艺类电影，不能分类在恐怖惊悚范畴，静下来看应该会觉得好看吧，不过现在人都太浮躁了，这种电影很可能不讨好
絮絮低语的旁白，古朴美丽的山村风景，失焦放大的镜头，令人迷糊的哲学文艺范来了。
本为人却未经人世，非人时却要幻化为人历经人世。马其顿乡间女巫诗电影，有情绪但段落都是老套，《四月三周两天》女主饰演的老女巫最有看头
3.5左右，视角虽新颖但仍有着局限的存在，摄影值得一看。事实上，把它当成恐怖片必定会失望，因它根本就不是所谓刺激肾上腺素的恐怖片。荒唐之处在于女人需要走过男人那一遭才完整，但这同样也是真实的一点：许多女性一辈子没有搞明白自己需要怎样的眼光来看世界，需要怎样的皮囊，从女儿-妻子-母亲。她们从未是自己，哪怕是成为被狩猎的女巫，也是如此。
定档了，但这个阵容就蛮杂的（不过我喜欢?）看预告还可以唉//虽说是叙述女巫成长，但整体还是男性视角，题外话:以为carloto是演女巫爱的男孩没想到是女巫本人，felix才是那个lover，但是这种纯净懵懂的状态梦回a cara que mereces
稍微有点不适 但依旧感慨母性的伟大 最后一幕挺绝的
其实吧，这片子很让我惊喜，我上一次看到这么清澈的画面还是在去年年底看的断背山，而现在我居然在恐怖片上看到了这样清澈的画面，但这个女巫有点恶心，向从猛鬼屋片场走出来了，剧情剪辑后面有点审美疲劳，但作为现在的恐怖片来说，算是很成功了。
故事其实还不错，但是这叙事真心让人无力，像是看了110分钟的MV片头剧情铺垫，文艺得太傻逼了。
不适的场景和温馨的氛围造成的冲突感，用以表达女性的抗争和爱的主题，文艺片新动向。
也就只是一周口碑榜的片子了。导演有点贪心，好像什么都想讲，最终却又好像什么都没讲清楚、没讲好。所以，导演到底想干嘛？
台词真的很好，把许多毒辣的东西写得那样美。电影感也很强，就像对比起来，驴得水只能称得上是一出舞台剧。只是，太虚空造作的形式，太虚无缥缈的表达，加上这个比娄烨还晃的手持，让一部本该在这个内核里有更好表现的片子，没有达到观众的期待
这个题材真的太难过了，尤其是反过来，爸爸照顾阿尔兹海默的青年女儿，爸爸真不容易妻子去世了，优秀要强的女儿这样，一个疑问，这些责任不是该美国的丈夫来负么，一开始干嘛不联系丈夫呢，也没说离婚啊，女主演技挺好尤其是车里喊不认识女儿了该怎么办那里。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
