Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
而除去单元剧刻画的疏失外，米克尔森的格林德沃也无法令人满意，全片缺少像第二部驺吾那样惊艳的记忆点，米勒的退场极其仓促，大概只有纽特的神奇动物才能给观众带来一点欢笑了，但这些亮点均来自前两部的铺垫，且无法真正填充150分钟的全片时长。
人物故事线搞得乱七八糟的一脸懵比茫然没太看懂！大概是中老年基佬爱情故事吧！可是我不想看两个中老年人麦麸，牙酸磕不动……这系列真成神奇动物在哪里了？🤧
本以为有了《神奇动物：格林德沃之罪》的票房口碑双失利，J. K. 罗琳和主创团队能吸取教训、力挽狂澜，拍出更好的《神奇动物：邓布利多之谜》，结果，这一部却成了我八部《哈利·波特》与三部《神奇动物》电影中个人观感最差的一部（要不是之前十部我都有在影院观影，看到这一部豆瓣才6.1分，我都不太想买票了）。期待的魔法、神奇动物戏份较少，取而代之的却是不少冗长无趣甚至与主线故事脱节的对话（小说这么写也许能丰富人物性格，但电影那样编排于我挺拖沓的），看得我一度困意来袭、差点睡去，都想倍速播放或直接快进了。此前费尽心思铺垫的麒麟以为后续会发挥啥大作用？结果，就这？我真是失望到了！邓布利多与格林德沃之间的感情戏也比我预期来得少！
主线剧情的话…讲了中年夫夫GGAD迟迟离不了婚最终利用合同的相对性靠命运第三人打破契约离了婚的故事，可见民法真的很重要啊（x
莫名其妙的节奏，让我这个曾经的哈迷差点看不下去。
到目前为止 这个系列我最喜欢的还是第一部 他给我看到魔法世界更多的可能性
删改两句台词很容易，但麻烦做些正确的事情，不要制作容易的事情。 to 过审组
华纳，你要么给我看无穷小亮大电影，要么给我看六大派决战光明顶，你TM的给我看叔叔卖腐是什么意思？
最爆笑场面必须提名：纽特和他哥与蝎尾兽群一起摇摆。这个绝对可以载入名场面，真的笑到整个厅都要背过气的感觉
还不如先拍一小时邓布利多用血盟虐待自己，再拍一小时格林德沃用血盟折磨邓布利多
铺垫的一集，但算是往正轨上走了，给了Klove producer的头衔，应该后面会越来越好。“还有谁会爱你，邓布利多？”然后轰然一声，血盟破碎，阿不思心中某个东西永远地失去了，再也不会回来，他是爱他的。我的妈真的爆哭呜呜呜，裘花终于贴上原著的老邓了。我还是要说，阿不思·邓布利多，才是世界上最伟大的魔法师！！！
爱，善良，真诚，这些能够击败一切邪恶
人物故事线搞得乱七八糟的一脸懵比茫然没太看懂！大概是中老年基佬爱情故事吧！可是我不想看两个中老年人麦麸，牙酸磕不动……这系列真成神奇动物在哪里了？🤧
很烂，以及故意为了政治正确加入lgbt和asian的部分，整个就很拧巴
6/10。大卫叶茨是一个制片方意志的传声筒，当制片方做不好明确的类型片规划，作品就呈现出凌乱拖沓的叙事、不紧不慢的平白对话和浮光掠影的特效处理。拓展魔法世界的恢弘意图在这一部彻底垮塌，反而像漫威宇宙般将多位主角行动统一在游乐园影像中，从魔法会所、纽约街区、藏地民居上演的大破坏，到矿洞里纽特学着蝎子将两只手（钳子）举过头顶、横着走路，与红蝎子们共进退的惊险幽默元素，再到巫师竞选集会上的烟花电光秀，看到的尽是风格疲倦的视觉展示。格林德沃的线索铺垫依然体现在对历史上欧洲法西斯力量的反映，但他如何煽动民粹、加深魔法世界与麻瓜的冲突上，大量情节都只有结果没有过程，而邓布利多与格林德沃的情愫、暗与明的对决，甚至给大众没读过他俩同人文就没法看明白的印象，奎妮对雅各布回心转意/答应结婚的感情线同样少了一些铺垫。
CG牛逼，特效不错，武戏最好看竟然是在开场的桂林山水!但是故弄玄虚且拖泥带水的文戏太多，感觉好像憋了很久就只放了一个屁。六大门派围攻不丹，格林德沃向麻瓜宣战，莫不是影射希特勒屠杀犹太人的滔天大罪?
两星半。魔法世界都要靠麒麟选皇帝了？麦叔真的太不性感了，怎么PUA裘花的？？？（没有说麦叔不好的意思）
夸不出口（。第二部的哥哥还看上去像是职高辍学会打老婆的体力工人 这一部突然变贵好多！像是会在贵族男高里霸凌nerd基佬的资本主义渣滓了（？
不知道是不是我专注力有问题，还是剧情bug到我都有些看不明白了。
4.8 多花500坐了vip看，心疼死。屎裡找糖，麥花好嗑，但GG這個角色寫得好沒意思
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
