Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
好闷的片子……大开脑洞的设定，本来可以是有深度的故事，被讲的拖沓又老气，光有偶尔闪光的演技也撑不起来……
【7.5】太久没看柯南伯格长片，都忘了他就爱搞这种猝不及防的结局。《大都会》的味很冲（以对话为主的闷片），混上肉体恐怖的奇观盛宴，能给恐影爱好者过把瘾。顺带重新定义了一把艺术、欲望、政治...
NEW SEX!!!所有夸张强烈的视觉冲击最后都归于情爱，归于亲密。切开我就是进入我，一场手术，便是一场高潮体验。老式的行为已然生疏，隔空对望，也能完成心领神会的性交。
分了四次，终于强迫自己看完了，除了解剖满足了我的猎奇兴趣，其他的真是不可理喻，感觉老导演都更注重叙事，但柯南伯格好像反了，除了宣扬他前无古人的审美情趣，剩下的基本上就是故弄玄虚了。因为他搞了个本不清晰的设定，结果自始至终都在写抒情诗，对设定毫无解释又简单直白的呈现，那种神秘感就没了。
的活动的一致，只能被看作是并合理地理解
哈哈果然是行为艺术现场，充满了影射暗喻和艺术家的逆向思考，小k表演最出彩，暗合了神秘的双向吸引力，又有点疯狂和诡谲，某种层面上，成为影片气质的投射
脑门上四颗腰果真是太disturbing了
4.5。廉頗老矣，尚能飯否？失卻了在感官刺激層面的部分鋒芒後，柯南伯格仍舊將自身對於面向未來的「人」之定義的思考，系統地呈現在這部論文式的《慾望號快車》的精神續作。儘管本片未能真正實現突破既有感官束縛的超感官體驗，卻依然堅定地為人類中心主義立場書就悲歌。結尾宛如《聖女貞德蒙難記》的特寫神蹟再臨。
由人来改变的，而教育者本人一定是受教育
提出对进化的质疑，“某种程度上人类也在退化”。这观点挺有意思。
柯能堡迷恋的“异化”母题，搭配“内脏整容”、plastic eater等概念，我还是喜欢他的口味的，世界观也出来了，就是结束得比较唐突……
文本陈旧，概念陈旧，美术缩水，知觉层面啥都没。实在太不行……电影手册的编辑也老了吧。可能唯一辩护的点：他可能就是在做一部怀念式的电影。
【7.5】太久没看柯南伯格长片，都忘了他就爱搞这种猝不及防的结局。《大都会》的味很冲（以对话为主的闷片），混上肉体恐怖的奇观盛宴，能给恐影爱好者过把瘾。顺带重新定义了一把艺术、欲望、政治...
看得懵……人类为什么会进化，对痛觉的感知为什么变了。是进化还是退化？自我“剖析”还是自残，娱乐至上还是行为艺术？人类应该吃下自己的工业垃圾？痛苦可以和欲望连结：surgery is the new sex，什么进化方向才是正确？我觉得想要探讨的东西很多，但都没表达得太清楚，或者比较开放……
虽然是一个经典的柯能堡式异变故事但整部电影的质感十分干净。这一次柯能堡选择去讲述内部的腐败，一种在黑暗与未知中悄然发生的变异。这种变异是适应自然的进化还是违背伦理的改造?柯能堡留下开放式的答案，他更着迷于美和艺术在其中参与的角色。
尽管现代医学十分发达，但人类身体的奥秘依然没有被完全揭示，那种好奇心和探索欲会激励着一代又一代的有识之士去不断发掘其真正的价值，并且最终为自己、为这个社会所用。大机器时代的便捷性使人变得越发冰冷，人类似乎不再需要通过这种人际交换去获得想要的一切，实现了一种虚无的自给自足；但那终究只是生活的障眼法，越是看似不重要的事物往往可能愈发宝贵，说到底是我们的选择造就了我们的未来，个体在集体中永远应该有一定的独立性，这样的人生才更加精彩。
柯南堡每十几年赶一次时髦，80s的《录像带》讲点媒介病毒，90s的《感官游戏》讲点虚拟实境，这次讲无痛非进化，本来以为要对药物下手，结果只是提供个背景材料。表面上换汤换药，未来罪行压根没拍出什么耳目一新的东西，这个paradox of evolution还是自己抄袭自己用了《感官游戏》的两派对立，现实派、虚拟派是有的，但什么长器官派不长器官派、吃工业垃圾派不吃工业垃圾派就比较无趣了。用的道具也还是那点土得掉渣的内脏虫虫软东西。其实单纯讲进化、接入、体验、性瘾，前面两部已经拍得够好了。就身上打洞这点这个用滥的标准柯南堡性暗示，他还怕观众不懂非要大白话讲出来。这几年憋着不拍科幻好像也没啥长进啊
电影放映中大批观众偷偷离场，大批观众悄悄睡着，是不逊于电影本身的奇观。
@@完全不能理解柯南伯格对肉体的迷恋。最后吃塑料真是拯救了世界。
难以想象，柯南伯格居然拍出了如此无聊的作品。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
