与巨兽同行 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 2002

导演: Matthew Dyas

剧情介绍

  For thousands of years, humans have believed that there were once flying monsters. But did they really exist beyond our nightmares? 220 million years ago dinosaurs were beginning their domination of Earth. But another group of reptiles was about to make an extraordinary leap: pterosaurs were taking control of the skies. The story of how and why these mysterious creatures took to the air is more fantastical than any fiction. In Flying Monsters, David Attenborough the worlds leading naturalist, sets out to uncover the truth about the enigmatic pterosaurs, whose wingspans of up to 40 feet were equal to that of a modern day jet plane. Attenborough works with scientists to understand the incredible story of the evolution of the pterosaurs, a story that unfolds in such stunning locations as New Mexico, the Jurassic Coast of Lyme Regis in Britain, an ancient pterosaur landing site in Southern France and a fossil pit in Germany where near perfect pterosaur specimens have been found. The central question and one of the greatest mysteries in palaeontology is: how and why did pterosaurs fly? How did lizards the size of giraffes defy gravity and soar through prehistoric skies? Driven by the information he finds as he attempts to answer these questions, Attenborough starts to unravel one of sciences more enduring mysteries, discovering that the marvel of pterosaur flight has evolutionary echoes that resonate even today. Flying Monsters is a groundbreaking film that uses cutting-edge 3D technology and CGI to bring the story of giant flying monsters and their prehistoric world to life. Audiences of all ages will be in awe as they enter the world and experience, as never before, REAL Flying Monsters in HD.

评论:

  • 慎博敏 9小时前 :

    一句话,新冠病毒就是狗日的美国弄出来的!这帮挨千刀的不得好死

  • 广向卉 1小时前 :

    那些说"爽"的人,你们确定你们真的知道什么叫"爽"么?你们真的接近过"高潮"么?

  • 凌采 3小时前 :

    安全屋的惊魂一枪加一分,河边追逐加一分,讥讽米国的虚伪政治用心加一分,战友情也很不错

  • 彩鹤 3小时前 :

    典型爽文情节 但我就吃这一套哈哈哈哈哈哈

  • 改英媛 8小时前 :

    前面花太多时间去铺垫了,完全没必要。九不搭八

  • 包晶燕 9小时前 :

    没什么起伏,动作戏还可以,就是最后反派死的太快了,连个打斗都没直接秒。

  • 愈令暎 7小时前 :

    有个问题:本片为什么叫《承包商》,直接叫《喋血雇佣兵》或者《退伍老兵复仇记》不更直白吗?

  • 慧洁 7小时前 :

    3分了 不能再多 剧情和拍摄都有点老了 最后把坏蛋除掉 男主存活下来 感觉有2?

  • 平骞 5小时前 :

    很典型的美国退役大兵电影。深刻的主题是国家、军队军人、至高无上的国家利益、和随意牺牲的个人利益之间的冲突,有些老套,商业电影,槽点较多,打发时间

  • 卫留成 6小时前 :

    这部电影还行吧,就是感觉有点那么老套,而且特效有些还比较明显,不过总体来说还是不错的。

  • 卑凌青 3小时前 :

    可以当作印度版的“白宫沦陷”。节奏很快,尺度很大,科技战狼,我国要是能出这样电影就好了!还有情节同《纸钞屋》。吐槽,印度的超级士兵也需要光刻机才行啊,最后收尾仓促且离谱,只为大团圆结局。

  • 城秋芳 9小时前 :

    派老师间隔一周两部作品真是加量不加价,承包商确实比高0.1分的宝刀未老好看很多。典型到家的美式英雄主义,略逊于同模式的生死狙击。柏林下水道战有点特工片味道,片子也高强度反映了退伍老兵的生活,提了嘴病毒。派的演技是最强看点,和本的反应依旧相当不赖。总的来说,从演员到故事都是及格线往上的下饭片。

  • 初骏 7小时前 :

    很多细节(包括部分台词)很不错,准确精炼。与之形成鲜明对比的是调动不起来的整体剧情,以及因此不得不从头到尾硬拉紧张气氛、过于有存在感的配乐。

  • 振辰 3小时前 :

    剧情老套 结局收尾草率 boss战也不激烈

  • 塔采春 1小时前 :

    克里斯派恩啊,拍完一触即发你还不长教训吗,唉

  • 嵇云飞 5小时前 :

    能看,但是逻辑漏洞有点多,不如同样是豆瓣低分的 黑蟹行动

  • 宏心诺 4小时前 :

    为谁打工?/干这行水太深,一定要谨慎呐,最后为了全人类不考虑把真相爆出来吗?

  • 山丽容 4小时前 :

    漏洞百出的情节、荒诞不经的逻辑,倒是满眼的大牌帅哥帅爷,可惜撑不起来场面

  • 叔晗蕾 6小时前 :

    制作粗劣,情节不严谨,漏洞百出,收尾更是显得草率.

  • 吉中 4小时前 :

    可惜了 本福斯特 感觉演啥都是没好下场

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved